THE MAGNIFICENT MOTION LAMP

One of the most glorious cultural icons which reached its zenith in the USA during the unparalleled era of peace and prosperity that was the later years of the Eisenhower presidency (although certain foreign countries and minority groups might have a different description for that time period) was the motion lamp. A motion lamp was a light bulb in the middle of a platform. Above the light bulb was a spike. A plastic cylinder (the"spinner") with vanes on it would be placed over the bulb and on the spike, and the heat of the bulb would cause the spinner to rotate. A larger translucent rigid cylinder containing both an inner and outer wall was then placed over the whole assembly (although in the very early models made in the 1930s, the inner and outer walls were separate pieces). 

The spinner and the inner and outer walls of the rigid cylinder would be perforated, fluted, or painted in such a way that the rotating spinner would create an animated picture when viewed through the rigid cylinder, such as a stream with moving water flowing through a blazing forest fire with flickering flames, fish swimming in a tank, a burning barn, a boy urinating (really), a steam locomotive billowing smoke and passing through the countryside, etc.  If you by now are hopelessly confused by this inartful description, just look at the pictures below.

A hardware or furniture store in the late 1950s would often have dozens of  these lamps on display with their vibrant colors and different types of scenes in motion to create a glorious optical cornucopia--complemented with the sweet aromatic ecstasy of volatile compounds released from the overheated plastic cylinders. The lamps were frequently purchased to place on the top of TV consoles, which sixty years ago usually consisted of a large glass tube embedded in a massive wooden cabinet (I personally would not recommend attempting to put a motion lamp on a modern flat screen television).

  

Although a few of these entertaining illuminating inspirations were manufactured until relatively recent times, most were made prior to 1962.  The use of too hot of a bulb would make their cylinders and spinners warped and brittle, and as a result, their attrition rate during the past half-century has been quite high. The lamps occasionally show up in antique stores (with stratospheric price tags), but to find one in decent shape and working condition is an extremely rare and wonderful event.

To see motion lamp action, click here.

1931 Scene-In Action "Marine Scene"--It
originally sold for $7

1958 L A Goodman "Niagara Falls"--One of the
 most colorful and aesthetic lamps made

THE CANADIAN-ROMAN SYNERGY

Readers of these Factoids will recall an assertion that Leif Erickson was probably the first European to visit North America--sometime around the year 1000. However, a recent article in the Boston Standard suggests that Leif may have been an explorer-come-lately by several hundred years. Specifically, the finding of an ancient Roman sword (a "gladius") by a fisherman, purportedly from a Roman shipwreck near the infamous Oak Island of Nova Scotia, suggests that Europeans may have visited the New World over a thousand years before Columbus.

This is a story which will require further review as time marches on. It would be interesting, for example, to see what is found if and when the shipwreck is salvaged. In the meantime, however,  J. Hutton Pulitzer, the researcher investigating the sword and surrounding events, states that the following evidence indicates that America might have come perilously close to becoming part of the Roman Empire: Members of the Mi'kmaq tribe, native to Nova Scotia, carry gene markers in their DNA normally found only in those of Eastern Mediterranean descent. Mi'kmag petroglyphs discovered in the 1800s appear to resemble Roman troops and ships. Fifty words in the Mi'kmaq language correspond to Roman nautical terms. A Roman legionnaire's whistle was discovered in the area in 1901. A boss from the center of a Roman shield was discovered in the 1800s in Nova Scotia. Two stones found on Oak Island were engraved with an ancient Eastern Mediterranean script. Gold Roman coins were discovered on the mainland near Oak Island. And, finally, the area contains the invasive plant European barberry (Berberis vulgaris), used by the Romans as seasoning and to prevent scurvy.

While it is cool to imagine that the Romans invaded Canada at one point, one must keep in mind that these latest revelations unfolded conveniently at the very time when the History Channel is hyping its series, The Curse of Oak Island, about unlocking the secrets (including, perhaps, buried treasure) on that piece of controversial real estate.

Embed from Getty Images

COMING OUT ON THE CLOSET

Anyone who makes a habit taking formal tours of American historical homes from the 19th Century or earlier will note than many of these houses--or even mansions--did not have closets in most of the bedrooms or a central closet for overcoats and the like. The explanation provided by the tour guides for this phenomenon is usually something along the lines of "the tax on the house was based on the number of rooms, and each closet counted as a separate room." In other words, like today, where virtually every financial decision is not based on its own merits but instead on the tax consequences, the imposition of taxes influenced architecture and encouraged the construction of dwellings without much closet space.

An internet search will reveal that many persons still subscribe to this theory, while many others maintain that closets were not ubiquitous in the past simply because they were not necessary then where people had far fewer garments, which would fit nicely in a dresser, chest, or armoire. In support of their hypothesis, the tax-theory naysayers often refer to an unidentified study done by an unknown person at an unspecified time which established that there were no such tax laws in the original thirteen colonies. They also cite to examples of specific old houses which in fact had a closet or two.

Well, who is right in this highly emotionally-charged controversy? I don't really know--probably both sides. I do not believe, for a variety of reasons, that  the tax theory should be automatically discarded, including: 1) "Closet" in the old days did not refer merely to a small enclosure built as a component of a room--it was also used as a term for a small room used for prayer, study, or contemplation. 2) Presuming that someone did in fact establish that there were no "closet = room" laws in the tax codes of the original thirteen colonies, that does not mean that such a provision did not arise in other states or territories or that it did not originally exist when the colonies belonged to England (which for sure had weird revenue provisions, such as the dreaded and paneful "window tax" of 1696). 3) The fact that some old houses had some closets does not prove that they were not taxed--only that the owner was willing to take on the tax burden. 4) I embrace and automatically accept as true any and all hypotheses purporting to illustrate how misuse of the power to tax has all sorts of unanticipated consequences.

Ironically, with the advent in modern construction of huge walk-in enclosures for garments complete with windows, electricity, heating/cooling ducts, and furnishings, many closets are now in fact rooms for all practical purposes.

THE CARCHARODON COMMUNIST COMMENTARY

One of Fidel Castro's favorite movies is Jaws.  He claims that he likes it because it portrays the evils of capitalism when it depicts the mayor of the town trying to keep the beaches open and the dollars rolling in during tourist season notwithstanding the danger posed by a known man-eating (and woman-eating) shark.

View image | gettyimages.com

MOTOR VEHICLE OPTIONS YOU MUST ESCHEW

We have earlier noted that the U.S. government now determines for its subjects what features they must have and cannot have on their automobiles. The following are some of the items on a list compiled by Popular Science of just a few of the contraband things you dare not install on your car but which are available in other countries.

DYNAMIC HIGH BEAMS.  This feature uses a complex array of electronics and sensors to automatically dim the only the portion of the high beam headlights which would blind an oncoming driver in the opposite lane while fully continuing to illuminate everything else. The USA permits only devices which totally shut down all of both high beams--a feature first introduced by Oldsmobile in 1952.

DYNAMIC LIGHT SPOT.  This is an infrared beam which detects pedestrians on the road at night and shines a spotlight on them in time for the driver to see them and take evasive action.

STROBE BRAKE LIGHTS.  These are brake lights which flash rapidly during a panic stop to alert following drivers that they had better consider slamming on their own brakes. A normal slow braking would simply cause the brake lights to glow brightly but not strobe, just like they do now.

REAR-VIEW MIRROR CAMERA. It is illegal in America to replace the interior rear-view mirror with a camera which shows what is behind you--even though the camera could provide a wider view and eliminate the notorious blind spot.

REMOTE-MOUNT MAGNETIC CAMERA. You cannot in the USA install detachable remote cameras to help you see blind spots.

LIGHTWEIGHT SEATS. The government says they are not safe, although I would think that I would rather have a lightweight seat pushing me forward against my seat belt in the event of a crash rather than a heavy behemoth.

ASPHERICAL MIRRORS. These are external mirrors which are curved in such a way as to eliminate the blind spot. 

Click here to see how all of this federal regulation started.